Find a Lawyer

DR. ZAKRIYA TARIQ versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

Sections 20 and 41, Schedule, R6 (7) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition was sought by the applicant, who was appointed for a vacant post at the University, but the Government had not responded to the same complaint. Set. In the constitutional petition, the applicant stated that the authority to appoint was only conferred upon the University, which was to fill the vacancy by following the procedure laid down in the University of Lahore Ordinance, 2002, The proceedings were considered under the ordinance under Article 7 under the Act. The University of Schedule to Section 41 objected that the applicant's request was premature and ineligible because the posting of the respondent was a temporary arrangement subject to certain conditions, including the approval of the syndicate, as provided in the ordinance. Was. The reports for the proper orders and the appointment of the respondents have no doubt that this was merely a provisional provision of the Syndicate Power for such appointment and posting under the powers and duties of the Syndicate provided under Section 20 of the Ordinance. Approval matters were yet to be finalized through the Syndicate, so no intervention was needed. Under the constitutional jurisdiction, the High Court constitutional application was dismissed under the circumstances power of attorney advocate Goular Khel lawyer