Find a Lawyer

SAADAT HAYAT KHAN versus MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LIMITED

The suit was ordered against the defendants, including the appellants Sections 15, 18 and 21. The appellant was neither a guarantor nor did he exercise any document in his personal capacity, so that the responsibility of the company could be shared. So the letter of assumption and the submission of title deeds were signed by the directors of the company including the appellant, in fact his appellant had signed it but in his capacity, the company director As a result, the responsibility of the company could not be transferred on the basis of two documents. In its sole discretion, the responsibility of the Appellant Company cannot be disclosed to its directors, who had no personal responsibility for the execution of the documents by the Company unless they executed the guarantors or other documents. ? top advocates from Parachinar lawyer