Find a Lawyer

CH. MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN

The petitioner was requested to review the decision of the Preamble Punjab Marriage Functions (Prohibition of Unexpected Performance and Waste Cost) Act (V of 2003), Arts Pakistan 188 and 185 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973) in this case. The request was heard by a request. After the conclusion of the Supreme Court bench and arguments, headed by the then Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, the application was granted in open court which was noted by the Court Associate in the original file with the word "permission" Said, it was announced, was reported in print and electronic media, because it cannot be ignored. The bench should have consisted of judges to re-hear the matter, who heard the matter and decided: After that, the learned judges of the Supreme Court also had to become members of the bench. Those who serve food to the guests at the wedding ceremony were not in the scope of the extravaganza. It was almost inevitable that in the light of the words of the Holy Prophet, there could be some happiness, which included offering food to the guests, who came to attend the wedding. That there were many occasions besides the wedding, where good food was served like food served, and there was no such restriction: since such food was served during the wedding ceremony. There was no justification for the ban and that the food was served. Do not place any burden on the host as the participants in the marriage contribute to the expenditure is justified; the decision announced was not a decision in the eyes of the law, nor was it written jobs for advocates from Rawalpindi lawyer