Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus CHIEF EXECUTIVE

Regulation 32 (2) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance (XCI of 2002), Sections 45 (2), 49 (4) (E), 52 and 63 of the Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), A. XXXXX Interim Relief, Appellant's Appellant's Denial. Appointed as Tho Helper, was eventually promoted as a Junior Engineer. The BPS 17 Appellant participated in the activities of the Union and was not only the Secretary-General of his Union, but also of the Junior Engineer. As appellant's development, senior senior vice president was also banned from participating in BPS 17 Appellant's activities on the basis that he was no longer a laborer. The Department of Industrial Relations Ordinance 2002 was banned from taking part in the activities of the application under 49 (4) (e) of. The appellant of the union had also filed an application for interim relief under the National Industrial Relations Commission (Regulation 32 (2) of the Regulations, 1973), which was rejected by the member national industry. On the basis that the Appellant stated that the Appellant stated that the three terms / conditions for the provision of relief failed to be proved, as a matter of irreparable loss and balance of convenience as attached under Order XXXIX. Has been made, that the applicant of the CPC appellant had stated that the three prerequisites were not attracted as Order XXXIX, the CPC was not applicable in this case the appellant further claimed that BPS 17. Has been announced as a junior for his development as an engineer who did not materially affect his duties and the nature of the work Will not be brought into the employer's jurisdiction because of its duties property advocate from Shakargarh lawyer