Find a Lawyer

SYED NADEEM SHAH versus STATE

Under Section 11 and 16 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), the accused accused of kidnapping contradictory versions of section 366 evidence was sentenced to trial. , The accused was found guilty under Section 11 of the Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979, and the trial court upheld the sentence taken by the defendant that the prosecution's version was not permanent and that he had told different stories of the incident. Were presented. The defendant further requested that according to medical evidence, no sign of violence was found on the abductor's body, nor was he subjected to rape and his temperature was maintained. ? Initially, the complainant did not receive a request but was changing the version as he wished, as no offense was considered under Section 11 of the offense. The Anna (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance, 1979, was created because the prosecutor failed to produce evidence that the abductor was abducted or forced to marry against her will or forced Unlawful intercourse was, or was, even forced to engage in unlawful intercourse or even forcible, unless the PPC was punished under section 366. And the sentence could not be sustained under Section 11 of the Ordinance. The law was passed by the Shariah court and the accused were acquitted. Appeal allowed under section 11 of the Enforcement of Adultery (Enforcement of Haddood) Ordinance, 1979 tax advocates from Tibba Sultanpur lawyer