GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, RAWALPINDI THROUGH STATION COMMANDER (H.Q.) SIALKOT versus MUHAMMAD BASHIR
Article 149 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), the recovery of the amount filed by the federal government for the recovery of Section 115 money, was dismissed by the trial court on the basis that the same three-year verdict and decree. Was filed outside. The limitation of the application submitted by the Government to the Appellate Court approved by the trial court was the limitation period set out in Article 149 of the Act, 1908, because it had a period of sixty years and It was not three years, the two courts had moved their decisions and rulings in their decisions. The case was dismissed by the federal government claiming to have been disregarded in Article 149 of the Schedule of Limitations Act, 1908, and thereby dismissed, as well as considering Article 149 of the Limitation Act 1908, under sanctions. Not to do was a material disorder. The misappropriation of orders passed by both the courts in the matter of final jurisdiction and limitations of the jurisdiction cannot be sustained by the exercise of the jurisdiction of the review under section 115. The CPC avoided turning down the dismissal decree into a decree approving the suit, and the order passed by the appellate court was set aside and sent to the lower appellate court to appeal the case. Was given. Anew
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
power of attorney advocate Hub Chowki lawyer