NOOR AHMED versus THE STATE
The statement under Section 302 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Section 342, 364 (2) and Section 342, CR PC, does not allege that the absence of the accused is a statement of the case in his presence. Were not recorded or that the court did not ask them questions or they did not answer the questions or the court did not record the answers at all or the records were not recorded incorrectly or that the accused had made their statements. Not sign or that the court did not sign it or that the complete and correct disclosure of their statements is not in the record in the absence of such objections. The signature of the accused and the judge who was also present with the statements was the same that was proof of that. There is a complete and accurate calculation of the accused's statements in the presence and hearing of the record and if any such objection could have been raised, there may have been objections. en In the absence of such objections, the mere absence of a certificate which could be due to ignorance, ignorance, error or any other invalid reason was not the amount of any illegality. There was an irregularity, which can happen. Fine under section 373737, CRPC
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near Kunri lawyer