M/S. OVERSEAS MARINE TRADING AGENCIES (PVT.) LTD. versus THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES, EMPLOYEES OLD-AGE BENEFITS INSTITUTION
Sections 11 and 33 of Pakistan Merchant Shipping Act (XXI of 1923), Sections 2 (c) and 24 (1) of Pakistan Merchant Shipping (Seamen loyment s Employment) Rules, 1961, Rr 2 (j) and 25 Contract Act (I72 of 1872). ), Section 182 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application Employees benefit from the contribution of the applicants were the companies providing maritime assistance to foreign shipowners, treating the companies as a ship's employer. Authorities called for their assistance in the maritime chain provided by them. The companies that were given the ship's owners were that they were neither their employees nor the agents of the shipowners who represented the shipowners designated by the shipowners. Representatives were included in the definition of owners under R2. j) Pakistan Merchant Ship (Sevens Employment) Rules, 1961 Authorities failed to record an agreement between the shipowners and the companies designated by the companies. Except for IR agents, under R2 (j) of the Pakistan Merchant Shipping (Seamen Emps Employment) Rules, 1961, they became agents of the shipowners and they were held responsible for the demand for partnerships under the Employees Old. The requirements of the agent described under section 182 of the Contract Act, 1872 were not attracted by the Age Benefit Act, 1976, in the present case direct maritime employment was prohibited and only the owners of the ship whose names came to the fore. Were able to recruit through. After applying the procedure on the list of license holders in which the foreign ship owners requested the foreign ship
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from Kotli Loharan lawyer