PARVEZ versus FARHAD ALI
The conviction of Section 2 (b (b)) evidence was fully sensible in the expected reduction at the time of the recording of the sender, capable of giving a version of the incident, and the medical officer was unable to obtain the certificate only irregularity. The deceased statement was no doubt, the author's death was justified by the police officer presenting him as a prosecution witness, there was no delay in the recording of the said sender, which led to the death of the injured. The record did not show that at the time of the recording of the deceased's statement, the deceased had a relationship with her Arrested, the deceased's statement did not indicate any weakness, the same was relied upon by the trial court, resulting in the motive for the crime neither the deceased's statement What was neither revealed nor defended by Jesus, who was drowned in mystery, the accused was sentenced to death, he was sentenced to life imprisonment under the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous lower court advocate from Tobatek Singh lawyer