MUSLIM SHAH versus STATE
Section 17 (4) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 302 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 203F (2) (a) Examine the evidence with the exception of a delay of 6 days in the recording of the confessional statement. After committing the robbery, the complainant entered the house, killed his cook with a firearm and then robbed him of gold jewelry, cash and dollars in cash. Although the confession was withdrawn, a severe case of evidence led to this. The place was reported to be empty. Gold bangles, other gold jewelry and currency trial court certified for the confession of pistols confiscated from the accused were sentenced to life imprisonment, but the Federal Shariat Court sentenced the death sentence to the revised jurisdiction. I had changed. A confessional statement of confession recorded with a delay of six days, whether confessional or extra-judicial, may be considered legally against the maker of these confessions, and if the confessions are found to be true and voluntary, Then there was no need to look at the more serious Supreme Court. The delay of six days was not taken into account as the confessional statements contradicted other circumstances, the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal by the Federal Shariat Court to uphold the death sentence.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Jamrud Road lawyer