Find a Lawyer

QAMAR DIN versus SECRETARY, AGRICULTURE, GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN, QUETTA

Section 11 of the Balochistan Service Tribunals Act (v. 1974), Section 4 service termination appellants were regularly appointed on different dates and served in their respective positions or for approximately 6-6 years, but their services were included in this project. Were eliminated under which they were. Appointment orders were issued that appointment orders issued in favor of the appellant revealed that the appellate appointment was made by the competent authority in the Agriculture Department, appointment of the appellants in the Agriculture Department was strictly temporary, without any reason. It could have been terminated on a two-month notice. The said project was mentioned in the order on which the appellant was appointed. There was no mention in the appointment orders that in the absence of the condition mentioned in the appointment orders, the appellant's services could be terminated after the cancellation of the scheme. Appellants were initially appointed in connection with certain issues. Posting the appointment of the CT will not affect the rights of the appellants which, in view of the contents of the appointment orders, the appellant was appointed on a regular basis in the Agriculture Department. And the appellant cannot be declared a project employee. Temporarily a responsible administration justified the termination of the appellant's services as contrary to the law and the rules, the temporary staff of the project articles had no legal effect and terminated the services as said orders were invalid. The order for the appellants was set aside and they were directed to be re-served with the return privileges from the date of their dismissal. list of supreme court advocates from Jalozai lawyer