Find a Lawyer

M/S. EMPLOYEES OLD-AGE BENEFITS INSTITUTION versus SYED MUBASHIR RAZI JAFRI

Sections 51 (a), 49 (4) (E) and 1 (4) (F) of the National Industrial Relations Commission (Regulations and Duties) Regulations, 1973, Regulation 32 (2) (C) of the Interim Prohibition Order The benefits organization alleged that the respondents disobeyed the interim injunction passed by the National Industrial Relations Commission on a petition filed under Regulation 32 (2) (c) of the National Industrial Relations Commission (Regulation and Duties) Regulations 1973. Contempt of court, which was filed under section 49 (4) (e) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 2002, to prove the allegations made by the applicants in the petition. Designated in the application's no documented evidence was not admitted people had disobeyed the orders of the interim prohibition approved by the national industry. Relations Commission Otherwise, on the basis of section 1 (4) (f) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 2002, the provisions of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 2002 did not apply to the applicants T / Employees Old Age Benefit Institution, filed by complainant Central. The application could not be applied by the National Industrial Relations Commission and an interim injunction was granted without the jurisdiction of the Commission; no contempt petition alleging disobedience was ordered. ? Under the circumstances, the offending request was rejected best law firm from Hangu lawyer