Find a Lawyer

MASOOD versus STATE

Sections 498 Central Excise Act (I of 1944), Sections 3, 38 and 49 Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990), Sections 3, 4, 6, 34, 35 and 36 Central Excise Rules, 1944, Rr 12 A & 13 Customs Guarantees before arrest, Sections 32, 131, 156 (1) (14) (77) (89), (157), 167 and 178 of the Act (IV of 1969) R was not charged. In the review of the records, there was no nexus of the accused involved in the illegal activities and they were involved in the case on the basis of justification as was the case with the customs as well as the presence of excise staff, The act of hoodwinking of any kind of work was one of the accused's case, which apparently showed that he did not appeal the arguments and, in view of this, further investigation from the material available on the record has revealed. That the accused participated regularly in the investigation and was associated with the investigating officer and that was why their detailed statements came out. It has also been filed that the prime fees did not indicate their involvement in the current case as the crime was made possible due to errors by the Commission and Customs officials, financed by the accused to drag them to trial. Rumors, which cannot be denied, are eligible for bail acceptance before trial, a pre-approved interim bail to the accused, confirmed that the accused was instructed to go wherever and whenever he wanted. Give yourself to the investigating agency patent advocate from Multan lawyer