Find a Lawyer

NUSRAT AZIM versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN

Section 108 Policy for Conversion Date 18 7 1966, Clause `(g) and (h) Stamp Act (II of 1899), Section 27A Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application Grant policy to market on ninth year lease Rate Estimates Applicants held property under the Property Grant Policy Military State Officer with the Cantonment Board, issued notice to applicants that they were demanding huge sums within a few days. Applicants complain that the clause states that market prices have not been assessed. ) And (h) the change policy made by the applicants in the 18 18 1966 decision that while assessing the land, the valuation table prepared by the collector pursuant to section 27A of the Stimact Act, 1899. Should have done It was under the policy that the Evaluation Committee needed to evaluate the market price and not follow the consensus table prepared by the collecting authorities. In the assessment table of the Constitution's jurisdiction, the revenue authorities retained, though not bound, the Committee for Evaluation, which had to be given serious consideration in terms of clause (g) of the Policy. As a foregone conclusion, the High Court will not hesitate to reject it. The High Court had put aside the notice of demand of the authorities in which the High Court had made it clear that clause (h) of the change policy of 18 19 1966 qualified for possible compensation. Complete lease receipts within one year after finalizing the market rate and, therefore, a notice requiring applicants to complete the lease within one year, not one day. list of advocates from Rabwah lawyer