Find a Lawyer

DILSHAD KHAN LODHI versus ALLIED BANK OF PAKISTAN THROUGH PRESIDENT AND 3 OTHERS

Section 2 (xxviii) and 25A West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), Section 2 (i) and Section O15 of 15 Service Complaint Requests Employers Against Order of Termination of Employment Claimed that the employee was not an employee, at the time the employee was in charge of the Foreign Exchange Department and the employees had resigned. Any manual or academic work to determine the status of an employee was the basic test that was the basic duties assigned to the employee during his duties. The employee can only be declared an employee if he / she performs important work. Were among the duties. Clerical nature and not otherwise scientific or manual duties must be of a basic nature and occasionally not of a nature. The registration of a document will not be sufficient to say that the employee was employed on the job of scholarly employees. It may be shown that the applicant occupies a responsible position and his primary responsibility is not to do manual work while the employee in cross-examination was himself admitted that he was working in the Foreign Exchange Department at the bank employee. Admitted that a power of attorney was executed by the bank in his favor, the employee said. Also admitted that five other employees were in the Foreign Exchange Department, some of them were doing scholarship and manual work and that they were not doing manual and academic work and were only signing checks and statement slip labor. The court correctly concluded that the employee was not an employee and the Labor Court accepted the employee's complaint request best advocate from Warburton lawyer