Find a Lawyer

STATE versus SYED QAISER SHAH

Sections 497 (5), 156 (2) and 173 of the Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), Section 9 (C) and 51 of the Anti Narcotics Force Act (III of 1997), Section 6 (2) of Section R600 (I) 97 / B 97 bail, cancellation of bail was given to the accused on the charge that the complainant / investigating officer is not the HO of the police station, he could not investigate the matter and it could result in legal reclamation of the cannabis. Further investigation into the accused's case is needed. There is no doubt that a sub-inspector was investigating this crime by the police, but that the operation itself was prevented by the police sub-inspector from conducting drug investigations or in this case by invoicing. Will fail. Unlawful section 156 (2), under the provisions of the CCPC, in any case, the action of a police officer, at any stage, will not be questioned on the basis that the matter is the one for investigation. Such officer was not authorized under the said section. In the case of submitting an Erg challan or submitting a final report under section ? or73 under, naughty individuals, facing illegal PC operations, will not set aside a bail order, and have granted bail to the accused. Had gone property advocate from Talhur lawyer