KARIM BAKHSH AND OTHERS versus MST. KHURSHID BEGUM AND OTHERS
Clause 42 and Su 54 of the civil court's jurisdiction to prosecute the plaintiff claimed that he was the owner of the suit land because of his seal of rights and the defendants had no right, title or interest in it. In which the plaintiff also prayed. Negative entries can be corrected in the Revenue Record in the event of facts being ludicrous, the plaintiff also prayed for a permanent injunction, resulting in the plaintiff's claim that her legal claim was in her legal possession. Was intercepted who acquired the land in dispute with his father through Tamilak of the same as Dover at the time of marriage when the suit was decided simultaneously by the two courts under the agreement. Alihan claimed that since the claim was based on the plaintiff's claim, the civil courts had no jurisdiction over the matter.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
solicitors from Chak Jamal lawyer