MEHMOOD BARNI, PROPRIETOR INTERHOME, GUJRANWALA versus I.A.C., COMPANIES RANGE, GUJRANWALA
The tribunal's rejection of the Appellate Tribunal's appeal under section 134 and 156 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 134 of Article 199 Petition Income Tax Ordinance 1979, was rejected by the tribunal, but later applied to the applicant. According to the miscellaneous request made by him, his appeal was accepted after the department filed a petition under section 156 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979, exacerbated the matter and the tribunal returned its earlier order through a former party order. Whereby the appeal filed by the applicant was accepted and the previous order was canceled Challenging the diversified plea, ruling that the latest tribunal order was a very extraordinary task and a very strange case, in the circumstances, the Chairman, Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was allowed to appear on a bench other than the Bench. Was sent for a stay that had already been taken over. That the whole matter can be reconsidered and the instability corrected according to the law
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Wazirabad lawyer