Find a Lawyer

COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, LAHORE AND OTHERS versus UNIVERSAL GATEWAY TRADING CORPORATION AND ANOTHER

Sections 162, 163, 171, 179, 193, 194 A & 196 Notification Section RO No 495 (I) / 85 Customs Duty, Substituted Alternative Functions Treatment of False Assistance Search Without Warrant Importers paid customs duty on imported goods through them, but the customs intelligence authorities raided them without a warrant, seized the goods and seized them on the basis of misrepresentation and filed a criminal case against them. Because of this, the importers submitted the order of customs authorities to the High Court, in which the court had to issue the goods on the offer of bail bonds to the authorities. Of Daity. Authorities urged that the constitutional request is not viable in the presence of appropriate and effective treatment before the High Court. Notices under section 171 of the Customs Act, 1969 also served for importers. Customs officials completed all legal receipts before finding a warehouse; registration of a lawsuit against importers by the High Court in its constitutional jurisdiction. Interventions are not guaranteed, however, under normal circumstances, in accordance with the provisions contained in section 162 of the Customs Act 1969, immediate and emergency proceedings must still be processed, pursuant to the terms of section 163 of the Customs Act, 1969 Cannot be searched, which was decided by the High Court and directed the importers. Was asked to consult the relevant forum in which it is available. Strong appeal of customs laws was allowed to resolve their complaint immigration advocates phone number from Chakwal lawyer