MESSRS HINOPAK MOTORS LTD. versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
Section 9 [as amended by the Labor Laws (Amendment) Ordinance 1993]. Labor Laws (Amendment) Ordinance, 1994 and Labor Laws (Amendment) Act, 1994] Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petitioners who were the employers and were contributing to the wages of each person who had 1500 in their insurance. Not more than Rs. Under the Employees Old Age Benefit Act, 1976, at the rate of 5% of its wages, the employer has accepted the obligation to issue an amendment ordinance under which they are responsible for all employees. Became wages whose wages did not exceed Rs. 3,000 a month and with the approval of it as an act of Parliament, justified the issuance of the Ordinance. If aqt President should accept the legislature chose to make the conversation about this article without the consent or approval. This gap could not be contested and in such cases the re-ordinance issued at the expiry of the ordinance was a legitimate part of the legislature, the constitutional petition was dropped.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
