Find a Lawyer

HASSAN versus CH. TAHIR SAEED

Section 5, Schedule and 14 of the Guardians and Wards Act (VIII of 1890), Section 25 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application for the maintenance of the Family Court and minor Family Court for the care of children, the income of the father and the income of the source. Keeping in mind Determined the amount of payable care for children, but the appellate court reduced the amount of restitution to family court decisions and decrees. Family matters were not, nor should the application of the Code of Conduct be rigorously decided, nor was any other principle intended to be followed. Worrying before the court about the welfare and improvement of the minor court in such a scandal: a loco would act as a parent and many matters had to be taken care of in the proper position of the father of the children. And it was the wishes and wishes of the parents of the minors that their children should get a good education. They should be raised in a good atmosphere. In view of the rising cost of living, the High Court concluded that the Family Court The amount of restitution made by the plaintiff is substantial and substantially reduced and the appellate court's decision was not justified. Reducing the current amount was not feasible and was set aside and the Family Court was reinstated with the modification that the defendant payable for the month from the month filed by the plaintiff. Will be. pakistani advocates Khoski lawyer