CHAIRMAN, STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION, KARACHI versus ABDUL RASHEED SOOMRO AND OTHERS
Art 212 (3) Principles of Reinstatement Consistency in Service Employees opted for voluntary retirement, but before any order was passed by the authorities, the employees withdrew their powers, and the authorities challenged such order. Already enforced options and retired service tribunals. By employees, employees were restored to employment, the service tribunal's legal decision was in accordance with the law, because justice and justice related to the court of justice required that - because in the previous appeals, employees were reinstated by the service tribunal. , ?????? Should be accepted on the basis of existing employees on the same basis, Supreme Court refuses to interfere with the decision passed by the service tribunal.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
