Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YOUNAS versus THE STATE

O XXVI, R6 and O XXXIII, Rr 1 & 6 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 188 by the Supreme Court Advocate seeking exemption from addressing the court in the review application under the terms of O XXX The request was not moved. , Rule 6 of the Supreme Court, 1980, but the application for the purpose for which the Supreme Court order was granted was filed under Residence Supply v. A XXXIII, R1, Rules of the Supreme Court, 1980. Read with KR 6. In the presence of specific provisions of the law, it was generally not meant to provide a residence to exercise an inherent jurisdiction such as section 151; the CPC was not summoned, therefore, in this regard, the Supreme Court The application submitted under ORX 1 and 6 of the Rules, 1980 was not eligible. In the interest of justice, the Supreme Court rules; reviewed its first order on application under O XXXIII, RR 1 and 6 of the rules how to become a advocate from Mustang lawyer