Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD YOUNAS versus THE STATE


O XXVI, R6 and O XXXIII, Rr 1 & 6 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 188 by the Supreme Court Advocate seeking exemption from addressing the court in the review application under the terms of O XXX The request was not moved. , Rule 6 of the Supreme Court, 1980, but the application for the purpose for which the Supreme Court order was granted was filed under Residence Supply v. A XXXIII, R1, Rules of the Supreme Court, 1980. Read with KR 6. In the presence of specific provisions of the law, it was generally not meant to provide a residence to exercise an inherent jurisdiction such as section 151; the CPC was not summoned, therefore, in this regard, the Supreme Court The application submitted under ORX 1 and 6 of the Rules, 1980 was not eligible. In the interest of justice, the Supreme Court rules; reviewed its first order on application under O XXXIII, RR 1 and 6 of the rules

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates from Kot Mithan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.