MUHAMMAD IQBAL SHAH AND ANOTHER versus THE STATE
Section 302 (b) / 224/324/353/392/395/412/34/109/148/149 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 Evidence was appreciated, the complainant, a police constable Whoever was in the van described the incident, after the prisoners were taken to jail. How it happened during the trip, witnesses testified that witnesses testified that the police constable and who were injured during the incident had not been denied, and no one was present between the injured prosecution witnesses and the accused. Animosity was not detected. , Which was otherwise, an unusual phenomenon, was, in the circumstances, excluded
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law websites from Darya Khan lawyer
