Section 9 (b), 20 and 21, the testimony of the Inspector of Inspection, who conducted the raid, admitted that none of the adjoining houses was connected to the investigation, search and seizure and because of such error In the case of the directors, no reason was shown. He also admitted that no articles were recovered from the personal investigation of the suspect investigating officer, despite prior information that the resident's home was used as a drugstore by the suspect, an international smuggler. Was in use, and had capsules filled with heroin powder. In this, the search warrant was not obtained from the Judge of the Special Court under Section 20 of the Drug Abolition Act, 1997, and according to the record, no plausible explanation was available, saying that the refusal. The officer was required to obtain a search warrant from the judge, Special. The court
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
