Find a Lawyer

HAJI ABDUL HAKEEM versus JUDGE SPECIAL COURT ANTI-TERRORISM, D. I. KHAN

Sections 6, 7, 8 and 23 of the Contempt Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, Anti-Terrorism Courts Trial in Anti-Terrorism Act Moving application. , 1997 shall be drawn only when there is an alliance of sections 6, 7 and 8 of an act committed or against the threat and the consequences of that act or the scope of section 6 of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997. There is a risk of performing an action that I fall into. , They were subjected to terrorism and creating a sense of fear among the people and physical crimes to the victims and physical harm would not fall within the purview of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997. The psychological effects of violence that were always considered to be a decisive factor The court also had to see that in the minds of ordinary people a criminal designed to create a feeling of fear and insecurity and to create panic in society. The function parameters were to bring a criminal under the purview of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, the present case. Terrorism is not eligible for action under Section 6 or Schedule of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997. The High Court, while accepting the constitutional request, directed that the case be transferred to the court. The general under section 23 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 Pakistan, top advocate family court from Layyah lawyer