Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD NAWAZ AND OTHERS versus GHULAM SHABBIR AND OTHERS

O XLI, R 23 Appellate Court Appeals remanded the claim that in the early stages of litigation, they were arrested on appeal on two counts, though at the time of the first appeal hearing. It was said that the matters were left to the appellant It was further claimed that in the second round of litigation the appellate court did not justify the remand case for the determination of the two cases, especially since the parties had been in litigation for the last 26 years. If the jury was doing, the remand for the two cases cannot be remanded in the second round of litigation. Without first deciding whether or not the two cases were left in the first phase of litigation, although it was at the appellate court's discretion, not only did the parties present full evidence in the present case, The choice was 26 years old list of supreme court advocates from Havelian lawyer