HAMEED-UR-REHMAN versus SAID REHMAN AND 5 OTHERS
The accused charged in their appeal against the trial court on section 417 (2A) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), section 337A (i) / 506/148/149 Conan e Martyr (10 of 1984), section 129 Brit. Given the benefit of the doubt, the dismissed verdict could not prove its case against the prosecution, nor was the trial court showing any misrepresentation and evidence of the improper verdict. Because irrelevant evidence was properly appreciated and no illicit or inferiority was identified. After the trial was declared suspicious, the accused was not tried by the accused and was not brought to trial.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Havelian lawyer
