Find a Lawyer

KARIM BUX versus MANZOOR AHMED

Section 12 Contract Act (IX of 1872), Section 25 Civil Procedure Code (VV 1908), O XX, R 5 Suit for the specific performance of the contract suit together with the judgment of the trial court and the appellate court defendants Was declared unsatisfactory. The court's injunction had revised the decision and the order had alleged. First, the trial court was not legally competent to adjudicate four cases collectively because it was against the provisions of the OX, R5, CPC. Secondly, the material evidence found material contradictions. Third, the authenticity of the witnesses in the sale agreement was not signed. And fourth, that without a contract, a sale contract without a contract was a banned contract, under section 25 of 1872 advocates from Garh Maharaja lawyer