Find a Lawyer

MESSRS PEARL CONTINENTAL HOTEL, THROUGH EXECUTIVE MANAGER, KHYBER, PESHAWAR versus GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. THROUGH SECRETARY EXCISE AND TAXATION OF N.-W.F.P. PESHAWAR

R4 filed by the Northwest Frontier Province Finance Ordinance (XXIII of 2002), Sections 4 and 5 [Northwest Frontier Province Finance (Amendment) Ordinance (VII of 2003)] The West Pakistan Finance Act (I of 1965), Under section 12 of the Constitution-Pakistan (1973), Arts 199 and 163 Constitutional Requests for the North-West Frontier Province Hotel Tax Rules, 2003, were not in conflict with Section 4, the Border Finance Act, 2003 and the authority of the Department. To begin the evaluation process and as a result the orders were approved, there was no dispute between the two provisions and if there was a case, it was through R4. It was worth the recommended behavior, except the NWFP Hotel Tax Rules, 2002 were the same except that the total number of housing units in the rule of residential units available in Section 4, Border Finance Ordinance, 2002 Was added, with the addition of the word that maximum charges have been imposed on the housing unit. On any day of the year for which the tax assessment was valid for both the rule and the section, it would appear that there was no such dispute between the two, because of the fact that the latter has made available accommodation. Explain the total number and expression. Room rentals used in the previous rules attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Khoski lawyer