Find a Lawyer

ABDUL WAHEED versus MUHAMMAD BILAL

O VII, R 2 & O XLI, R 31 The plaintiff provided sufficient evidence in support of his case to recover the money The independent witnesses presented by the plaintiff fully supported the plaintiff's version and They had agreed in full on all material details. The trial stated that the witnesses were subjected to a substantial cross-examination, but could not be shaken. The appellate court correctly relied on the statements of those witnesses, and the adverse findings of the court material at the trial proved that the amount of suit against the defendant was outstanding. It has been fully involved in the dispute, despite repeated requests from the appellate court, and outlines the determination and the points that led up to its decision, under which the appellate court's decision documents recorded material. And O XLI was in accordance with the provisions of R 31, CPC did not comply. In this case of violation, the parties were alive in the dispute and they were GI Appellate Court on the evidence of the appellate court on any evidence or false reading or non-reading of the evidence. The appellate decision was not disclosed. Unlawful interference or irregularity of any kind has been infringed, no interference in the decision of the appellate court will be permissible; , But the effect can be found to be wrong. Be allowed to remain intact online advocate from Chitral lawyer