RUQIYA BIBI versus SAMIULLAH
The evidence on the notice of notice of the preparation of section 13 canon martyrdom (10 of 1984), Arts 75, 76 and 77 Secondary Evidence was in the Emperor's arguments that the Talab-e-Ashad was performed and it was not necessary to send the notice. ? Importer could not prove delivery of notice before accuracy; Prior to delivery or denial by the seller, the pre-emptor prepared the photo copy of the notice and was easily satisfied. The photo copy of the notice was obtained in proof of the provisions of Article 77. Can't be Under the Convention of Conduct Order, 1984, under Article 75 of the Law Contempt Order, 1984, the notice of the student was to prove its authenticity, if, despite the notice, the party in the original possession was not present, the article of the third party order In the terms of the secondary, the court may prove the document through secondary evidence, but the pre-emptor did not choose the course and thus failed to prove not only Talbosh's performance if the application itself was excluded in any case. If made, notices will also be given by him himself.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Dhatmal lawyer