MUHAMMAD FAROOQ BUTT versus TARIQ SHARIF AND ANOTHER
Section 13 Landlord's Personal Requirements To convert residential property into a residential tenant, he acknowledged his occupation, but pleaded that the property was not residential, but had commercial implications even if the landlord. Even when occupied, the law prohibits the change of residence. The building and the user to whom this house was made remains a residential building if the landlord sued for his leave on the basis of a personal requirement under section 13 of the West Pakistan Urban Rent Prohibition Ordinance 1959. Had presented. The controller had the authority to approve the eviction order but the landlord was occupying the rented residential premises and the need to fully occupy their premises was fully established by the High Court. Refused to interfere with the eviction order approved by the rent controller and maintained by the appellate court. In the circumstances the appeal was dismissed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Bisham lawyer