Find a Lawyer

SAIFULLAH versus THE STATE

Section 5 (2) of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 161 and 165 Definition of a Proof The Magistrate did not record the complainant's statement, but did not sign the blank papers after the raiding proceedings in his interim inquiry. Had obtained that he had not seen the money transfer case, from the complainant through the complainant, nor had he heard that the magistrate had not even seen the alleged money exchange case nor had he been accused. And the complainant had a tough conversation between the prosecution, in the circumstances it failed to prove the allegation. The recovery of the tainted money from the possession of the accused, especially when the raiding party had not heard the conversation between the accused and the complainant, nor had the accused seen the transfer of money, was not the result of the prosecution. ask a advocate free from Dandot lawyer