AZHAR AHMAD versus THE STATE
Section 2 (2 (b) / evidencere8) The value of the evidence was the father and first cousin of both the witnesses, respectively, and no independent and irrelevant testimony was presented by the prosecution to recover from one of the defendants. The incident happened because there was no chance of any crime being reported on the spot. Both the accused were the son of the complainant who was later contracted on the second contract, naturally the complainant complained against the complainant. Two and a couple of accused were Ahmadi, but later the accused on both converted to Islam complainant also accused the score N had malice against
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Narang Mandi lawyer
