Find a Lawyer

JAM SOBHA versus THE STATE

In the section 302/34, 97, 99 and 100 Criminal Code of Conduct (V 1898), the review against the Section 439 British Trial Court completely ignored the facts when the victim was empty-handed and lonely when he The suspects, who were three in number and armed with guns, also questioned whether they would allow the deceased to abuse and discredit them. The trial court had discussed section 100 and 97, PPC without mentioning section 99, PPC, while section 100, PPC could not be read. Due to the separation under section 99, the PPC evidence on record was not properly read and was appreciated by the trial court which required further detailed discussion and thus created misunderstandings. And consequently, the decision on the affidavit was set aside and a remand of the case was obtained. The court should resume the trial at the stage of the argument, according to which a review request was allowed advocate for immigration from Talamba lawyer