Find a Lawyer

EHTESAB BUREAU, AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR versus CH. MUHAMMAD HANIF

Section 497 (5) Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 409/34 Government Misunderstanding Act, 1948, Section 4 Public Office Misunderstanding Ordinance, 1965, Section 6 (5) Accountability Commission Act, 1997, Section 11 Bail, Supreme Only the Supreme Court can review the cancellation of the judgment, otherwise the law enacted by the Supreme Court was the law of the land and all the relevant law presented by the Supreme Court in the case of Accountability Bureau v. Chaudhry. Must have. Abdul Razzaq and others decided on 4 2003 12 2003, still filed a field petition for leave to appeal the case, was filed in the Supreme Court without the prior approval of the government and the law kept in the said case The appeal was not properly constituted in light and was excluded accordingly. online advocate from Noorpur nooranga lawyer