Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD AFSAR KHAN versus MUHAMMAD AZAM KHAN


Section 307/447/147/148/149 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Islamic Contemporary Laws Enforcement Act (IX of 1974), Section 15 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VII of 1974), Section 42 Evidence Reviewing Parties In the Shariat court, the pending judge recorded the statement of the complainant and the injured witness, and after that the complainant filed a review petition with the Shariah Court after a period of 1/2 years in which he was charged. Given that the settlement is not lawful, that is why a case can be established. On the one hand, the judge Shariat court, after hearing the parties, proceeded to appoint two arbitrators to decide the matter through arbitration, which was to be accepted by the parties after the complainant did not accept the said order, He then filed the case in the Supreme Court after legalizing the amendment. Duration 1 // of years, while a 60-day threshold was provided for review to be filed

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best advocate from Ghizer lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.