MUHAMMAD AFSAR KHAN versus MUHAMMAD AZAM KHAN
Section 307/447/147/148/149 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Islamic Contemporary Laws Enforcement Act (IX of 1974), Section 15 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VII of 1974), Section 42 Evidence Reviewing Parties In the Shariat court, the pending judge recorded the statement of the complainant and the injured witness, and after that the complainant filed a review petition with the Shariah Court after a period of 1/2 years in which he was charged. Given that the settlement is not lawful, that is why a case can be established. On the one hand, the judge Shariat court, after hearing the parties, proceeded to appoint two arbitrators to decide the matter through arbitration, which was to be accepted by the parties after the complainant did not accept the said order, He then filed the case in the Supreme Court after legalizing the amendment. Duration 1 // of years, while a 60-day threshold was provided for review to be filed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Ghizer lawyer