MESSRS PAK FOREST INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
Section 33 Section R50 (I) / 1992, Date 28 1 1992 Section RO 484 (I) / 1992, dated 14 5 1992 Return of customs duty, claim for importer seller, goods by contract, whereby buyer The duty importer was obliged to pay the duty importer for the purpose of obtaining the amount owed to the import of the goods. The power of attorney was implemented. 50 exempted from payment of customs duty. (I) / 1992 and 484 (I) / 1992, thus, the buyer himself claimed the return, but not as the importer's lawyer, the claim by the importer of the goods under customs duty return law. If customs duty was paid by the importer to the buyer as a lawyer, under contract, then he may be entitled to file a refund upon his return. To recover the same amount from the importer, the buyer was not recognized as an importer before the customs authority for the purpose of claiming a refund. Hello its right
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
