ABDUL JABBAR versus MST. PATHANI
A. XVII, R 3 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Articles 12 and 54 for specific performance and injunction restraint, after the trial, the trial was adjourned, but the plaintiff adjourned. Failure to do so by filing pending petitions for eight pending motions, add evidence The plaintiff's evidence was closed and his conduct was dismissed and proved That the plaintiff had been negligent and had taken the careless approach to proceed with it, in which case the plaintiff himself had failed to guide the evidence, The law will not assist the watchman, nor was it permissible for the defendant to turn to the plaintiff for the purpose of proof, as he failed to obtain the numerous opportunities presented to the evidence and was subject to any kind of unlawful interference. No, the orders of the courts below were upheld
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Gakhar Mandi lawyer