Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

NASEER versus MUHAMMAD HANIF


A. VIII, R2 Arbitration Act (X of 1940), Application for retrieval of section 34 amount was submitted to the respondent, instead of filing a defense and written statement, the defendant instead of filing a written statement. Submitted to, the application for the establishment of proceedings was filed under section 34 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, which application was dismissed and the matter decided to enter a written statement, three from the ascension of the written statement After the opportunity was lost, the court settled the case instead of debarring order or seeking restitution for the final settlement plaintiff. The application, which was excluded by default, escapes the second application under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, 1940

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Tarmatan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.