Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

DR. ABDUL WAHEED KHAN versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION ISLAMABAD


Section & 63 and In Tax Income Tax Ordinance (of XLX of 2000 of), Section 222 Office of the Establishment of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXV of 2000), Section 2 (3) Estimates of the Best Decisions Ex. The test was scheduled for the day that was not scheduled. The hearing and which had no obligation to guarantee a default ex parte order. The circumstances of the justification reflect the arbitrary conduct of the assessing officer in defining the Federal Tax Ombudsman and the Commissioner's request for Section 122A of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 to be dismissed. 306 2003 under section 63 of the Income Tax Ordinance of 1979 and that the complainant declares income of Rs 275,771 for the year 2000 2001 to be accepted under the Self Assessment Scheme.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
online advocate from Shemier lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.