Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD BASHIR THROUGH ATTORNEY versus ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF RELIGIOUS AFFAIRS; ZAKAT, USHER AND MINOR

Sections 8 and 10 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 of the Constitutional Appeal Trust's property, the property in dispute, which was transferred by the Settlement Department by issuing PTO and PTD, which was later transferred by transfer. The sale was made by its authorities, claiming that the property was in dispute owned by a charitable trust which was known as `Panchayat Punjabi Tehsil 'was a trust property and it was mistakenly transferred by the department settlement because the eviction. The property petitioner / Wendy challenged the authorities' claim on the basis that there was no material evidence to establish it. Was not recorded. In the dispute, the property is owned, it is said that the Charitable Trust Petitioner further claimed that in the absence of a trust deed, it cannot be said that the property belongs to the Charitable Trust, before the city survey was conducted. The record of the distribution of rights, it was clearly shown that the Panchayat Punjabi teaching was owned by the property in the Karachi dispute and owned by a charitable trio, although not submitted before the Partition Trust Deed, but by the Aotaki Trust Properties. Investigation of the facts recorded by the authorities and the record of rights have also established that the property in dispute The trust was owned by Karachi Karachi's Panchayat Punjabi Education Department, and it was also `` rent free property ''. It was said that the applicant failed to disclose the record of the facts found by the competent authorities. The application against the finding has been dismissed \ r \ n \ r \ n advocates from Patika lawyer