SASTAY KHAN MASOOD versus THE STATE
Section 5 (2) of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860) Section 161 Appreciating the Evidence As soon as the raiding party and the investigating officer were standing outside the concerned office, when the complainant entered the office, he stated that the officers had filed the complaint through the complainant. The accused was also seen while receiving the money. The same was recovered from the accused who, at the introduction of the magistrate, proved the complainant's statement through the statement of facts of the prosecution witness that the magistrate had not heard the conversation nor seen the bribe money being transferred to the accused. Difference
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from Chakwal lawyer