RAFIQUE HUSSAIN SHAH versus STATE
Section 98 Pen 98 Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Rule 324/109/34 pre-arrest bail, event grant was granted during the last hours of the night and, in connection with the alleged incident, the FIR was delayed by approximately two more. Was filed later. The half-day FIR itself showed that the perpetrators of the alleged crimes on the spot were unknown and the accused were not present at the site of the crime at the time. The indictment was leveled against the accused, but the complainant did not mention the day, time or place of the conspiracy to stop or provide for misconduct by the accused. There was no legally admissible evidence to prove the allegation of conspiracy infringement and sentiment, in view of the ongoing bitterness among the parties, the defendant in connection with his suitability in this case, of any substance or foundation. Without being thorough, the accused had already joined the investigation, the NG should be recovered from the suspect's possession and the physical custody of the accused was not required for the purpose of investigation, both sides were civil servants and the court They are very likely to be fooled if they enter their bail by ad interim arrest. not enough. Under the circumstances, bail was already given to the accused, it was confirmed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Shahkot lawyer