Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS AND ANOTHER versus TARIQ SULTAN AND COMPANY AND ANOTHER


Section 30 Central Excise Act (I of 1944), Section 3 (C) Central Excise Rules, 1944, R96Z Notification Section R No. 457 (1) / 96, dated 13th 1996, Pakistan (1973) Article 185 (3) the Supreme Court attended to consider the leave of appeal. Whether the issue of the Central Excise Duty for the Shipping was to be received as the customs duty under Section 30 of the Customs Act 1969, with respect to the date of entry and whether notification was made from the notification section R No. 457 (1) / 96, 13 6 1996, could have been levied by the respondents, and whether the price was to be assessed immediately with reference to Section 3 (c) of the Central Pricing Act. 1944, and as such, the R96 ZZ of the Central Excise Rules 1944 did not apply

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
patent advocate from Sambrial lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.