Find a Lawyer

SHER NAWAZ versus STATE

Section 514 was charged with the recovery of bond bail bonds for which the applicant stood on bail while presenting a bond of bail and failed to appear before the trial court petitioners. Unable to do so, the amount of bail was reduced to less than one lakh rupees. After losing ten thousand rupees to each, the accused presented by the petitioners in the court petitioners claimed that once they had filed the charges against the court. If they were to comply with these orders, then their responsibility would be removed and further action could be taken against them. The law was not guaranteed. Time Permit for Applicants to Applicants Applicants / Guarantees for Time Offering for the Preparation of Defendants Applied suspension of an order forfeiture of bail is granted because a person is required to present the accused and Cannot be held liable for both payment of bail money at one time. As long as the applicants were held responsible for the preparation of the accused and the grants were for that purpose, they were no longer obliged to pay the bail amount, until their permission expired and they were within time. Failure to present the accused when petitioners working in compliance with court orders allowed them time to prepare the accused. , When they were not actually responsible for paying the bail amount after the trial court ordered the accused to appear in court, they were set aside and the applicant liable to pay the bail bond. Was kicked out of the door \ r \ n best advocate from Haveli Lakha lawyer