MUHAMMAD IQBAL versus MUHAMMAD ARSHAD AND ANOTHER
Section 417 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 337F (v) Appeal to the British Trial Court, after considering all the legal and factual aspects, proceeded to convict and convict the accused. The sentence was pronounced, but on appeal, the court acquitted the accused and the Shariah court confirmed the same. After critical scrutiny of the statements of the complainant, the doctor, the witness, the recovery witness and the investigating officer, neither contradiction was found nor any other fact that stated that the statements of the witnesses did not appear to be true. The verdict of acquittal of the accused by the Shariah court was grossly abused, the facts on the record were not accepted based on the facts, the order to acquit the accused was, therefore, not set aside. Gone, in the situation
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Sakrand lawyer