MUHAMMAD AZAM DURRANI versus EHTESAB BUREAU
Articles 409, 467 and 471 of the Prevention of Corruption Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) Definition of Evidence During the trial, the prosecutor has to examine the accused under section 2, 2, CRPC. I was kept and there was nothing left that could suggest a reversal of the documentary evidence, especially the documents presented by the document. Clearly the accused had made a statement regarding the crime of the said expert, even the expert had declared himself unauthorized. The accused had relied on the inquiry report in which he had identified his involvement and the DNO. Was also taken advantage of.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Satyana Bangla lawyer
