Find a Lawyer

MURTAZA versus STATE

Bail was sought in anticipation of the defendant's grant arrest, prior to the arrest of Section 498 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), section 337A (i) (ii) / 34/504, it claimed. When he was revealed in the FIR, he was falsely implicated in a backdrop of enmity. He is accused of being respectable. The locality has irreparably hurt his honor and dignity due to his involvement with the complaining party by the police. The accused's involvement in this type of false case was due to misconduct by the police and his motivations were obtained by motivating the FIR shows that the accused was armed with bricks and said about it. He is said to have struck a brick with a piece. The bricks on the head of the injured were confirmed by the Medical Officer, who confirmed that Shuja Modia five was sentenced to five years, beyond the prohibited clause contained in section 497 (1), the legal position of which CRPC State Council. In this case, if an accused was extended on bail in the wake of his arrest, he did not object, the defendant succeeded in presenting a case for confirmation of bail, the same terms and conditions. Also confirmed \ r \ n \ r \ n famous lower court advocate from Mansehra lawyer